Multiculturalism as Uniculturalism

In the city of Oakland, CA it’s called tolerance when government promotes “Happy Coming Out Day” and then bans pro-family groups such as the Good News Employee Association (GNEA).

The treatment of the GNEA illustrates one technique by which America’s growing ranks of self-appointed speech police expand their reach: They wait until groups they disagree with, such as the GNEA, are provoked to respond to them in public debates, then they persecute them for annoying those to whom they are responding. In Oakland, this dialectic of censorship proceeded on a reasonable premise joined to a preposterous theory.

Liberals suppressing free speech.  They claim diversity to pursue their morality and cry hate crimes in order to shut down other people’s free speech rights. 

End of round one soon.

     The Senate Immigration bill is back. We defer to Michelle Malkin who has excellent coverage of the current situation. Looks like the bill will come up for a cloture vote on Tuesday of this week.

To What End?

Is it really worth it to win the battle but lose the war? I fear that for both sides of the internecine battle going on right now that is likely becoming the case. The loser? The Republican Party. Now, I am sure that this post will bring with it many comments from both sides pointing the finger at the other. So be it. But at what point do we all go too far and risk Republican majorities in the Legislature, greatly hamper the ability of our candidates to win back the two Congressional seats we lost last year and irreparably damage the party for years to come?

I have good friends on both sides of this battle and I understand and think there is merit in both sides’ arguments against the other side. I, for one, am not taking a side in this battle. Too many on both sides have adopted a “you’re either with us or against us” stance that I think is proving incredibly detrimental to everyone.

You may not like who is Chairman of the State Party. You may not like the apparent heavy handedness of the so-called McCainites. You might think the State Party is too conservative. You might think the Chamber of Commerce is too soft on illegal immigration. But whether you like it or not, we need all sides to buy in to the idea that we all need to work together to win in 2008. Intramural battles are interesting and I would argue good for the party when we are all fat and happy with big majorities in the Legislature, a lock on the Congressional delegation, and control of statewide offices, but they are a luxury we cannot afford in our present position.

We need to face some uncomfortable facts here. We are four seats away from losing the majority in the State House, three seats in the Senate. We face significant uphill, though winnable, battles to get AZ-05 and AZ-08 back. We don’t have control of the Governor or the AG offices. If you gauge a party’s success on winning races, then we haven’t had a good run of things over the last five years. Yet we continue to fight viciously with each other.

Now, I know, each side is going to want to say it’s the other sides fault. And, as I said earlier in this post each side is going to want to point the finger at the other. I understand that this is natural reaction, but maybe right now, not the right one. Because if we do that, this fighting won’t stop.

If you don’t believe that this kind of fighting is devastating to a state party, look directly west to our neighbors in California. Republicans, with the exception of a once in a lifetime candidate in Schwarzenegger, control basically nothing in California. There are many arguments to be made as to why that is the case, but I think one valid reason is the infighting that took place within the California Republican Party during the nineties. Each side felt the other side was responsible for the problems they had and each side, not matter who was in control, was quick to lay blame on the other side. Each side took the attitude that if the other side wasn’t going to do what they wanted, they were going to take their toys and go home. The chaos that ensued only hurt Republicans.

Like many conflicts globally, I fear the war going on right now within the Party is being driven by hardliners on both sides who believe that winning this battle is so important that they are willing to sacrifice the institution that is the Arizona Republican Party to do it. If this continues, one side very well may win. But it will take years and leave us with a Party that is weak and nothing more than a shell of it’s former self. I, for one, don’t want to see that happen.

Now some on both sides will say that I am being alarmist, and for the sake of Republicans in Arizona, I dearly hope that I am. But are we really willing to fight this battle to find out?

Before it’s too late, I implore both sides to lay down their weapons and come to an unconditional cease fire if only for the sake of all of the good candidates in our Party who are putting their lives on hold and sacrificing so much to run as Republicans in our state. Because, if we don’t, I fear that 2008 will not be a good year for Republicans in Arizona.

I have always felt the boiler plate calls for uniting the Party were somewhat trite and had very little meaning behind them. They have been co-opted by both sides who really mean that they want the other side to put aside their very strongly held beliefs on political issues and agree with them. That’s not what I am calling for here.

What I am saying is that we need to unite as Republican officeholders, activists,, candidates, and political operatives, behind the greater good that is a strong and vibrant Republican Party in Arizona as an institution. Let’s unite behind the common ground of winning races for Republicans.

I recognize that this is easier said than done. It won’t be easy. There are a lot of hard feelings on both sides that will be tough to overcome. But, if only because there is so much at stake this election cycle, we need to do it.

It’s time for Republican leaders, whether they are members of the Congressional delegation, respected activists on both sides, or financial backers, to have the courage and wisdom to step up and help end this battle.

I hope this serves as a clarion call to all sides in this battle that it’s time to stop. Look within and ask yourselves to what end are we doing this. If we don’t, we will all be losers. One side may win this battle, but we will all lose the war.

Hershberger to Switch Parties?

Pete Hershberger 

With the end of the legislative session, rumors have begun swirling that Senate Democrats have approached Republican State Representative Pete Hershberger to gauge his interest in running for the State Senate as a Democrat. The current State Senator for LD26 is Democrat Charlene Pesquiera, who won a narrow and surprising victory in 2006 over the Republican nominee Al Melvin. Most observers believe that no one was more surprised than Pesquiera, that she cannot win a rematch against Melvin, and that she has no intention of serving more than one term.

In the meantime, Hershberger is term-limited in the State House and is not anxious to run in a primary against Melvin, who thrashed the old incumbent, Toni Hellon, in the 2006 GOP primary.Hershberger owns by far the most liberal voting record of any Republican in the Arizona State Legislature and he is quite vocal about his liberal policies, taking pride in fighting against tax cuts and for tax increases. His Second Amendment record is an unbroken streak of “F” grades from the NRA and his lifelong pattern of voting with Democrats to defeat Republican bills has earned him the moniker “the Democrat’s favorite Republican.” A voting record more out of touch with primary voters than Toni Hellon’s doesn’t bode well for Hershberger, especially considering that Melvin beat Hellon by more than 13 points (10,924 to 8,303).Making things worse for Hershberger, Melvin is out of the gate early and garnering support from increasing numbers of party activists and many of LD26′s more moderate PCs. So it makes sense that Hershberger would listen to any plan that allows him to avoid a Republican primary in exchange for the full organization and financial support of the Arizona Democratic Party.

Of course, Hershberger’s family roots in the Republican Party are very deep, so no one can predict at this stage what will happen.

Hugh Hallman takes a “Wiz” on Pullen and Arizona GOP

scarecrow.jpg  What do you do if you are a Republican Mayor, running for re-election, while keeping your eye on the Republican nomination for Attorney General in 2010?  Well, if you are Tempe Mayor Hugh Hallman, you inexplicably go on the attack!  According to the Yellow Sheet, while at yesterday’s Arizona Chamber annual meeting and awards luncheon, Hallman “drew some subdued groans…with less than flattering remarks about Pullen. We’re paraphrasing here, but Hallman said Pullen has brought Republicans and Democrats together—through a common enemy, the Republican Party.”

Nor was Hallman done with his outburst as he then broke into song, dedicating “An Ode to Immigration,” a takeoff on “If I Only Had a Brain” from The Wizard of Oz.  The final line to Arizona State GOP Chairman Randy Pullen?  “If you only had a brain.”

No word yet on whether Hallman will be relying on the “tainted cough syrup”, “elevated blood sugar” or “temporary insanity” defense.

In Arizona, Bloomberg Would Have Stayed

Interesting post at AZ Political Intel on how Bloomberg wouldn’t have left the Republican Party had he been in Arizona – because Arizona Republicans still stand for Republican values, unlike what’s happened to Republicans in Washington D.C.

Prezelski vs. Paton

Just when you thought that legislators had put the session to bed without incident, things got really exciting at the State Capitol.

On the last day of session, the State House put forth an amendment on a bill that allowed the Dems to go on the record in their support for restoring voting rights to convicted rapists, child molesters and murderers. (Before it got to the floor, Democrats were successful in getting it through the Government Committee).

After the bill failed to pass the full house and several ACLU-lovin’ Democrats had put their fingerprints all over it, Democrat Tom Prezelski confronted Republican Jonathan Paton in the hallway over comments he made on the floor of the House.

Seeing he was confronted with the truth, Prezelski lost it. According to witnesses, he “lunged” at National Guardsman 1st Lieutenant, Paton.

The Republic’s Amanda Crawford reported the incident on her blog. Meanwhile the Capitol Times Legislative Report gave their take on what happened after the incident:

End-of-session dramatics was provided courtesy of Prezelski and Paton. After COW debate of S1623 (elections; manual audits; penalties) during which Paton argued against a provision — later stripped from the bill — that would have restored the voting rights of felons, Prezelksi confronted him in the hallway outside the members’ lounge. A witness told our reporter Prezelski was upset at Paton’s assertion that violent felons and sexual criminals should never have their rights restored. The argument was brief, but reportedly Prezelski “lunged” at Paton and was held back by Dem Counsel David Gass, while Ulmer ushered Paton away.
 
Ulmer and McGuire were the only lawmakers who witnessed the altercation. Others who were nearby say McGuire was upset at Prezelski, calling him “immature” and not deserving of her respect. Later, McGuire refused to speak with reporters, saying only, “I am now officially on ‘probation’”, pantomiming air quotes around the last word. Meanwhile, Ulmer apparently tried to downplay the incident, telling reporters “nothing happened” and “there is no story here.” She did concede there had been an argument that became heated, but she adamantly denied that Prezelski ever made a move toward Paton or that he had to be restrained.
 
When reporters went to Prezelski for comment, he became indignant about the questions he was asked. He stomped away from reporters after this brief exchange:

TP: Was it Paton that ran to the press?

Reporter #1: It wasn’t him.

Reporter #2: Can you clarify what happened?

TP: I think he misrepresented a bill that he was defending. He used some inflammatory language and accused Democrats of harboring criminals, and I don’t think that’s useful, and it had nothing to do with what the bill was about. And he knew that.

Reporter #2: So, did you physically threaten him?

TP: (raised voice) No, I did not physically threaten him. No, that’s ridiculous.

Reporter #2: So, what happened?

Reporter #3: We have witnesses that said that you lunged at him.

TP: I did not physically threaten him.

Reporter #2: Did you lunge at him?

TP: No, I did not lunge at him.

Reporter #2: So, what happened?

TP: No. This is stupid. I did not physically threaten him. Gosh, this is …

Reporter #2: Can you explain what happened?

TP: Did that guy tell you that? No, this is stupid. I’m not going to talk to you guys if you’re going to make shit up and listen to people who are making sh*t up. That’s stupid.

Incidentally, Tom Prezelski is the brother of Ted Prezelski, liberal activist blogger of, Rum Romanism and Rebellion. Seriously, we couldn’t have made this stuff up!

I guess one could say that Prezelski is the new Burnell-Smith

Crisis in Confidence

Amazing stuff from the latest Gallup poll.

 

Opinions

Only 14% percent of the people have have “a great deal of” confidence in Congress or “quite a lot, which is the lowest ever.  A lot of the blame lies with the political elite’s failure to deliver (social security reform) or to listen to the overwhelming majority of Americans (“comprehensive” immigration reform), but more blame rests on the media and Hollywood elites. 

We are fed a non-stop diet of government corruption, business greed, a sense of entitlement and a belief that you have the right to never be offended.  I doubt a day goes by without the US and European media criticizing our democratic institutions in general, America in particular or the Republican Party in detail.

Yet a large majority of Americans tend to reject that perception.  Afterall, confidence levels in the media are lower than President Bush’s approval ratings.

Notice also that the groups that complain the least, the military and church, do much better than the constant whiners, Congress and the media.

The great Tony Blair lays out the problems with the media in the Wall Street Journal.

Second, attacking motive is far more potent than attacking judgment. It is not enough for someone to make an error. It has to be venal. Conspiratorial. Watergate was a great piece of journalism, but there is a Ph.D. thesis all on its own to examine the consequences for journalism of standing one conspiracy up. What creates cynicism is not mistakes; it is allegations of misconduct. But misconduct is what has impact.

A brave German discusses the “big lie” of anti-Americanism held European media elites. 

As far as Hollywood goes, I for one would pay a lot of money to see a movie where US government agents, Christians or big business were portrayed positively and were not part of some grand conspiracy to subvert our freedoms.

Oh, that liberal media

MSNBC reports that about 90% of political donations from reporters and editors go to Democrats and liberal causes. 

But no worry, the Democrats, err “journalists”, assure us there’s no such thing as a liberal bias.  As a writer for the New Yorker explains it:

“I believe very much that writers have to be aware of conflicts of interest in all sorts of situations. Probably there should be a rule against it. But there’s a rule against murder. If someone had murdered Hitler–a journalist interviewing him had murdered him–the world would be a better place. I only feel good, as a citizen, about getting rid of George Bush, who has been the most destructive president in my lifetime. I certainly don’t regret it.”

Sonoran Alliance Welcomes New Arizona Blogs!

Sonoran Alliance is excited to welcome several new blogs to the Arizona Blogosphere!

Although its been around awhile, we want to make sure you follow border issues at Illegal Immigration Journal.com. This blog is dedicated to news and issues along our border. ¡Bienvenidos!

Arizona Political Heat offers another perspective on political news from around the state.

Then there’s Red State Arizona which grapples with Arizona’s political scene from a Republican perspective.

Finally, Arizona Political Intel joins the fray with great insider info on legislative and campaigns.

Here at Sonoran Alliance, we love the competition amongst conservative writers. Please take time to add these blogs to your blogroll!

A Pro-life disappointment

Sine die occurred last night as the 2007 Arizona legislature finished its work after a session lasting 164 long days. In a disappointing defeat, HB 2641, allowing parental consent for minors seeking abortion, failed by a mere three votes in the senate. Read the Bill Text.

This bill would have codified into law the Arizona Court of Appeals opinion on standards of evidence, requiring the minor seeking judicial bypass possess, “clear and convincing” maturity to make abortion decisions without parental guidance.After passing the House in March by a margin of 13 votes, this pro-family bill was defeated by a vote of 13 – 6. Sixteen votes are required for passage and 11 members were absent last night. Four usually reliable pro-life members, some with better excuses than others, were less than reliable, since they missed the vote entirely.

Sen. Chuck Gray (R – 19) left the chamber to attend an East Valley Mitt Romney event.

Sen. Linda Gray (R – Dist. 10) was en route to be with her mother, who was having surgery out of state.

Sen. Jack Harper (R – Dist. 4) was on a previously scheduled vacation this final week of session.

Sen. Jay Tibshraeny (R – Dist.21) was unavailable, according to his office, on unspecified “family matters.”

This is how your senators voted on the Senate Floor Vote.

Sine Die

Tying the fourth-longest session in Arizona history, the Arizona Legislature adjourned for the year, late Wednesday night, on day 164.  Sine die came shortly after passing a $10.6 Billion budget and several last-second items, including an employer sanctions bill for those hiring illegal aliens, reforms to the Clean Elections system, and a few other odds and ends.  Eyes are almost too tired to stay open, so we’ll be posting more details on the session, the winners and losers, and the issues that will be returning in 2008 in the next few days.  Stay tuned!

Grand, if only symbolic, gesture

Today’s LA Times details a GOP challenge to President Bush’s amnesty plan.

House Republicans Reps. Lamar Smith (R-TX) and Peter T. King (R-NY), have issued a sharp rebuke of the amnesty legislation causing a major rift within the GOP. The symbolic legislation, given no chance of passage in the Democrat controlled Congress, would disallow legal status for illegal immigrants in the U.S., require tamper-proof birth certificates for Americans and make English the nation’s official language. Enforcement of existing immigration laws is the cornerstone of the legislative package.

Newt weighs in on Senate Immigration Bill.

     Word is that the bill will come up for consideration in the Senate this Thursday.

YouTube Preview Image

“Doing Work” for slick Willie

I know, I know, this is pure tabloid but how can anyone resist — well, the Democrats can of course.

Accused Las Vegas ‘Madam’ Claims She Only Did Makeup for Bill Clinton

The lawyer for an accused Las Vegas “Madam” says she did work for Bill Clinton but only to provide makeup, not girls.

Alleged “Madam” Esperanza Brooks told undercover officers her clients “range from ‘Shaqille [sic] O’Neal to Bill Clinton,’” according to a police report obtained by the Blotter on ABCNews.com.

In the report, Brooks is quoted as saying she employed 40 girls who were “very discrete and only go with upscale people.”

“These are not your average girls,” Brooks said. “Some of them have worked with Bill Clinton.”

…A spokesman for former President Bill Clinton declined to comment to ABC News, but last week told the New York Post, in which the arrest was reported, “Apparently, total fabrications that get made up in Vegas don’t stay in Vegas.”

I guess its just another “he said she said” story and I don’t know who to believe, Bill Clinton or the prostitute.   

H/T Gateway Pundit.

Amnesty not selling in the heartland.

Sinking Ship     According to the latest Mason-Dixon poll for Iowa McCain has slipped to number 5.

Tucson In-N-Out breaks record.

burger.jpg     Now to some really important news – The new Tucson In-N-Out store was their biggest opening ever.