Arpaio “attacks” Kyl?

sheriff joe.jpg   While we can’t be certain, according to arguments made by Nathan Sproul, Gordon James and The New York Times, it appears that Sheriff Joe Arpaio is now “personally attacking Jon Kyl.”  Of course, we don’t believe that for a moment, but read what our good Sheriff had to say about the current immigration bill before the U.S. Senate:

“I don’t like to criticize Congress, but in this case their approach to solving the illegal immigration problem is all wrong,” Arpaio says. “We put people who break the law in jail and that’s exactly what we should be doing with illegal immigrants. Amnesty is not the answer.”

Oh my, here come the rapid responses from Sproul et al, as they savage the Sheriff for his “shameful and divisive attacks.”  We are quite sure that they’ll be calling for his resignation and firing up the autodialers, asking Kyl supporters to call the Sheriff and tell him to “stop attacking Jon Kyl.”  They will next go on national television and decry the Sheriff’s “mudslinging and dirty tactics,” as they tearfully beg him to “stop tearing the Republican Party in two.”

Or maybe not.  Maybe they really don’t think these comments are personal attacks and it was all about wanting an opportunity to take cheap shots at the man who stopped their gravy train, or defeated their wife, or passed Prop 200 over their objections, or mobilized and fired-up the grassroots of the party in a way that no chairman has in recent memory.  Sure, not attacking the Sheriff will make them look like hypocrites, but maybe they don’t care about what they look like.  The goal is what they’re focused on, and that’s a never-ending effort to damage Randy Pullen, regardless of what they do to the Republican Party in the meantime.

The next day or two should tell, as we breathlessly await the barrage that, even now, a conference call somewhere is no doubt outlining!

A Reprieve.

     It looks like the Republic is safe for now. The U.S. Senate does not plan to reconvene until June 4th. They will be in session for the rest of June and then they take off one week for the Independence Day Holiday.

“Despite denials”

     Some voices have suggested that because of his history as a conservative that Senator Kyl should be given immunity from criticism for supporting a flawed illegal immigration bill. It is true that Kyl has carried the water for conservative for decades and he deserves credit for his past service to the cause. One of the people who drilled the well so that there would be water to carry, Phyllis Schlafly, weighs in on the S.1348.

“Deadbeat Parents” hall of shame website is bad idea

The Maricopa County sheriff has pictures of fathers on its website who owe back child support. This is a bad, bad idea. There is a double standard when it comes to women and men and child support. If a woman becomes pregnant and decides she doesn’t want the child, she can drop it off as an “abandoned baby” after it’s born – no questions asked, no child support ever required. If a man doesn’t want his baby after it’s born, he has no choice – the court almost always orders child support, and will always award it if the mother wants it. Many of these “deadbeat dads” are simply having a hard time making ends meet, and there is no sympathy from the court – either pay the $700/mth or so ordered per month, or be considered a “deadbeat dad.” The mothers are rarely ordered to come up with any money themselves. This needs to change; it’s time to end the stigma against fathers and realize it’s not a terrible crime not to have enough money. These men should not be placed in the same category as criminals. Mothers must be held equally as responsible. Otherwise, there is not true equality between the sexes.

Husband of GOP state chair candidate who lost attacks state chair

Well isn’t this interesting. Gordon James, the wife of Lisa James who ran for state chair last fall against Randy Pullen and lost, is attacking Randy Pullen. He isn’t even identified as such. The letter doesn’t say much except the tired old Nathan Sproul talking points which are already all over this blog. Attacking Pullen and the party does nothing but divide the Republican Party. When is Kyl going to stop the anti-Pullen former establishment from destroying the Party? The media is having a field day with it, the liberal reporters on Horizon last night were gleefully discussing how it’s hurting the Republican Party. A lot of the criticism is coming from party hacks who are no longer in control of the Party – they need to get over the fact that their candidate lost and now it’s time to work together.

Honoring those who kept us free

MemorialThis is the weekend we kick-up our grills, fly our flags and search almost hopelessly for a movie that portray’s our servicemen as heroes and the US as the good guy.  The movie Platoon doesn’t count.  The History Channel seems to be our last best hope.

GatewayPundit has graphed the number of soldiers who died to keep us free in each our country’s wars.

[US+war+fatalities.jpg]

Here are those numbers adjusted for population.

 [war+losses+vs+population.jpg]

Interesting how deaths have declined over the years. GatewayPundit points out that military deaths in the current War on Terror are half of what they were during the Clinton years. Ouch.

Reality Check.

     Last we checked there was no Devine Right of Senators. In fact since 1913 the commoners themselves have been allowed to decide on who will represent them in the Senate. Many people have been wailing about the attacks on poor Jon Kyl. Is it permissible to criticize an elected official? Yes it is. That is one of the tenants of our Republic. The people can speak up.

     Is it warranted in the case of S.1348? That is a good question.

     First, this is a conservative political blog. While most or all of the writers may be registered as Republicans that does not make this an official part of the Republican Party. Therefore we are not bound by the same constraints that party officials are.

     Certainly Senator Kyl has spent the vast majority of his time in office as the point man for the conservative cause. The issue then becomes is it possible to commit an act that negates or minimizes that past record and opens the Senator to current criticism? That is a valid question and one that people should be allowed to discuss. Another relevant point is the issue of whether the Senator is being candid in how he represents S.1348. People may disagree on that issue but we should still be free to debate the manner in which this bill is being sold to the public.

     Frankly I do not understand what all of the fuss is about. Kyl is not up for re-election for several years. If the moderate Republicans are at all interested in the future of the party they should be on the phone to the White House and to the Senate telling them that they cannot sell-out a large block of the party and still have a party left. The choice is clear, ignore the base or listen to the base. But please do not ignore the base and then tell us not to be upset that we feel betrayed. Many of us genuinely believe that granting immediate legal status to tens of millions of illegal aliens is a short sighted fix to the immigration / border security issue and that it is also an egregious affront to the citizens who obey the laws of the land. Many illegal aliens have committed multiple crimes such as illegally entering the U.S., obtaining forged or fraudulent documents, providing false social security numbers, not filing income taxes, etc. If they get a pass then we should all get a pass. During the Iran Contra scandal the press loved to say that this was a nation of laws not of men. Well the same applies today. This should still be a nation of laws not of protected political classes, Senators or illegal immigrants.

     The glue that holds together the legal system is not that we enjoy being held to the law but that we like it when everyone one else is held to account before the law. S.1348 weakens that glue to such an extent as to weaken the fabrick of society. So yes some of us may be concerned about that and may even critisize a servant of the people who tries to tell us otherwise.

The rich earn their money

An interesting report out today.  The rich aren’t people who inherited their wealth or stole it (the liberal view).  Rather

70% of the nation’s big family fortunes are less than 13 years old, according to research and marketing firm The Harrison Group. And the people who amassed them are, first and foremost, entrepreneurs — risk takers for whom wealth is a byproduct of pursuing their passion.

Becoming a millionaire in today’s America is pretty easy.  It just takes self-discipline, hard-work and guts, which explains why a lot of otherwise talented people aren’t rich. 

Is it me or do all these scientific “studies” merely confirm the wisdon of our grandparents or the studies are just plain wrong. 

Meanwhile, the New York Times reports top executive pay has fallen by more than 50% since the Clinton years.  I blame Bush – making the rich poorer!  Of course, the Times spins this as the gap between executive pay and average worker’s wage as widening.

The Pay Gap at the Top

What’s that saying: “better to be unequally rich than equally poor.”  Well, that’s what us capitalist Americans used to say.

(H/T Instapundit)

This About Sums It Up

Hmm, we wonder who is behind the anonymous phone calls?

idiot.GIF http://www.hotazitgets.com/ has the transcript of the automated phone calls going out to Republicans trying to rally folks against the State Party Chairman Randy Pullen. The caller is not identified, nor is who pays for the call. The anonymous attack is factually incorrect as it claims that Pullen is attacking Jon Kyl when the exact opposite is true. It is nothing more than a sleazy attack on the Republican Party and its chairman. Gee, we’re having a tough time trying to figure out who would have access to automated dialers, a list of voters, and a grudge. Any ideas? Anyone?
What has been very interesting is that the calls give the number for the state party headquarters so that people can call and complain about Pullen. And it almost worked. Folks at the HQ say that their phones have been ringing off the hook alright, but the calls have been in opposition to Kyl’s bill and in support of Pullen’s work representing the Arizona Republican Party’s position. Oops, that’s probably not what the cowards who put out the call had in mind. Who could possibly have made such a strategic campaign blunder? This must be their first campaign, because anybody who made these kinds of mistakes wouldn’t last long in politics, eh? They just spent their time and money on a commercial for Pullen.
So now the question is who were the calls targeting? If it was just Republican voters then someone may be breaking the law, because voter lists can’t be used for these kinds of calls. If it was just PCs, then bad news for the insurgents and good news for the Party because the PCs are supporting the Party’s position. If it was just a list of Kyl’s supporters, hoping for a sympathetic audience, then very bad news for the shadow warriors, because then Kyl’s own personal base is against the bill.Seriously though, whose dumb idea was this call anyway? Somebody out there is putting personal interests above party interests and trying to bring down the Arizona Republican Party. Could it be a Democrat? After all, these kinds of actions are music to the ears of Napolitano, Pederson, and the rest of the Democrats. If it was a Democrat, then we’ve got to hand it to them for being very smart. Let’s see if we can find out together, alright?

Nathan Sproul needs to stop attacking the Republican Party

Just received this email which is being blasted around to Republican hacks -
Fwds deleted

Political consultant Nathan Sproul, still bitter that his candidate Lisa James lost the election for Arizona Republican Party chair last fall, needs to back off on his attacks on the state party. Sproul, who most party hacks blame for the GOP’s big losses in Arizona last fall, has been emailing and calling Republicans all over including at the national level complaining about the state party, and twisting the party’s measured response to the Senate’s illegal immigration bill into assertions that the party was attacking conservative Senator Kyl.

The problem with this accusation is that the state party has been making considerable attempts to work with Republican leadership (who can forget the photograph of McCain on their homepage a few days ago?). Although there are many in the grassroots who are calling for Kyl’s resignation, saying he lied, and changing their voter registrations in protest, the state party has tried to be a bridge between Kyl and the grassroots base. The statements released by the state GOP analyzing the Senate’s illegal immigration bill are thoughtful and nuanced – does this sound like the rant of someone who is trying to remove Kyl from office? I think Nathan Sproul needs to get over his bitterness and move on. Trying to divide the Republican Party by creating false accusations against it will end up doing nothing but hurting himself. The party has new leadership which is trying to work with all Republicans – Sproul needs to back off.

Here is what Pullen wrote on the state GOP blog regarding Kyl. Unless I’m on drugs, this is praising Kyl.

Over the course of his distinguished career, Senator Kyl has earned a lifetime “A” rating from the National Rifle Association. He has frequently earned near-perfect or even 100 percent ratings from such organizations as the American Conservative Union, Americans for Tax Reform, National Right to Life, National Federation of Independent Business, US Chamber of Commerce, Americans for Prosperity, and the list goes on.

Senator Kyl is considered one of the ten most effective US Senators in Congress today. From protecting our paychecks to protecting our families to protecting our nation, Jon Kyl has been Arizona and America’s most dedicated patriot for decades. He has fought our tough battles time and again, and tomorrow he will be there fighting just as hard with just as much pride. More than once I’ve heard Senator Kyl referred to as a statesman, not a politician.

Republicans should call Sproul and tell him to stop tearing the party apart. 480.303.7175

We are schizophrenic on immigration

The reason that immigration is the most difficult issue in a generation to solve is because the American people are schizophrenic about it.  On the one hand the vast majority of Americans cite illegal immigration as one of the most pressing problems in our nation.  At the same time, big majorities (between 65 and 75 percent depending on what survey you are reading) believe that we should provide those here illegally (who are working and crime free) with ability to stay here under some legal status.  And almost 60% believe that illegal aliens should be able to gain citizenship after those who are trying to do so legally have done so.

The New York Times and CBS News did a poll of 1,125 adults between May18-23.  Some interesting findings:

More than 70% believe illegal immigration weakens our economy by driving wages down. But more than 65 percent agree with a guest worker program with more than 50% believing that those guest workers should be able to become citizens (that is beyond what even the Senate immigration bill does).

57 percent think that recent immigrants have been a benefit to the country, but 35% said in the long term immigration would be bad for the country while only 28% said it would benefit us. (Presumably the rest had no opinion or thought there would be no change)

In the most dramatic example of our schizophrenic nature, a full 82% said that the federal government should do more to address illegal immigration but only 15% favored fences as the main control tool.

25% believe we should have a completely open border and 25% believe we should completely seal the border (the question I have is why there is a 10% difference between those who want to seal the border and those who think a fence is the main component to do so.)

I suppose it is only human nature that we are of two minds on this issue.  It is easy to rail against illegal immigration (as I do on a regular basis) when I think of it in terms of an ephemeral group of “them.”  However, when you put a human face to it, things begin to get more complicated.  I experienced this first-hand when I had a rare opportunity to accompany some border patrol agents on duty (I have a buddy who wears the green uniform) and they interdicted a group of illegals.  I have to admit, it was an adrenaline rush to be so close to the action and to see the agents work quickly to get the two dozen illegals corralled (they gave a feeble attempt to run, but figured they couldn’t outrun the SUV’s we were driving.  The agents lined them up and one-by-one searched them for weapons and asked various questions. 

I got a chance to ask some of the illegals questions through one of the agents who was fluent in Spanish.  There was a mother with a young girl.  They apparently did not have any connection to the rest of the people with whom they were wandering the desert south of Tucson.  According to what she told the agent, there was no husband and she could not find work to support her and her 9-year-old daughter.  I have to admit, the “tough guy” attitude I was displaying began to fade.  When the mother pulled her daughter’s backpack out of her own backpack, I was startled to immediately recognize it as the identical Strawberry Shortcake backpack that my 8 year-old daughter owns.  She then rifled through the pack looking for something, which she eventually found and handed to the agent.  He handed it to me explaining that it was the daughter’s most recent report card – she was a straight A student.  By that time I was darn near tears as I thought about what I was witnessing: a single mother with a straight-A student daughter was literally risking their lives to walk across the desert on the hope that she could find work.  As I looked at the little girl I visualized my own daughter, trying the fathom whether it was an incredible act of love that this mother would embark on such a dangerous journey or completely insane.  It struck me that love can be strong enough for us to do irrational things.  At that moment I concluded that if I was in her shoes, I’d probably do the same exact thing.  By this time I was such an emotional wreck that I walked away and sat in the truck, I couldn’t handle the impact this experience was having on me.

Since then I have drawn some conclusions. 

1 – Our border patrol agents are heroes.  To face that kind of circumstance day in and day out has to take a toll.  And yet they put the boots on every day and get out there protecting our border.

2 – We have a seriously broken system. 

3 – I don’t know the best way to solve it.  Clearly we can not tolerate the continued lawless flow of illegals.  At the same time, as Reagan said, we are the “shining city on a hill” and to get here legally takes literally decades.  I generally support a fence, and using advanced technology to supplement.  I also think that we are woefully short of manpower on the border.  And, I think we need some sort of guest worker program.  As to what to do about those here already?  I tend to the subscribe to the “attrition” theory that if we strengthen employer sanctions for those who employ illegals and make sure non-citizens are not getting welfare and other government benefits some of them will go back. 

4 – I thank God every day that I was blessed enough to be born in this great country, a place that offers so much opportunity that people risk their lives every day to get here.  Quite different than the experiences of people risking their lives to get OUT of a country – think Eastern Europe during the Soviet rule.

The bottom line is that something needs to change.  Unfortunately, as long as we as a nation remain schizophrenic on this issue, I don’t think we’ll solve it anytime soon.

In the meantime, I occasionally wonder what happened to that little girl, the straight-A student.  I replay it all over in my mind, watching her getting in the back of that border patrol truck and watching it drive away, headed to Nogales to drop her off on the other side of the border. 

Then I look at my daughter… and it makes me want to cry.

Remember Me

YouTube Preview Image 

Please watch this video. 

In all the rhetoric about immigration, let’s not forget about our brothers and sisters abroad.

They are fighting a people who are driven by a religious extremism that seeks to kill anyone who does not believe like they do.

I’d like to see the ACLU, People for the American Way and the “Reverend” Barry Lynn call Christians extremists after they meet these people.

Whether we like it or not, we and our children’s children ARE in a worldwide religious war.

False Reasoning.

     You can tell a lot about the strength of someone’s view by the rhetoric that they use. The current talking point for the Senate Immigration Compromise is that the only alternative is to round up and deport 12 million illegal aliens. This is a total canard.

     First, none of the reasoned voices against this bill are even talking about a mass deportation. Second there are always other options but McCain and Chertoff keep talking as if the only two options are pass the flawed Senate bill or have a mass deportation. Opinion polls tell them that deportation is very unpopular so they juxtapose it with the Senate Bill to make the flawed comprise bill look better by comparison.

     There are several other options. First, focus on securing the borders in a meaningful way. Second, enforce a real employment verification system so that only those here legally are hired. That is a very reasonable option. Some people may not like these ideas but they are options. Options that the political elites do not want to mention because they may be preferable to the current Senate Bill. They would rather give you only two choices, their flawed bill or an unpopular alternative that no serious scholars are recommending. It is a sign of how desperate those behind this bill are and how weak their case for this bill is.

     Thomas Sowell has penned another well-written article titled The Amnesty Fraud: Part II. Great reading.

National Review Editorial on Immigration Bill

The National Review has a terrific editorial on the Immigration Bill titled “It’s Worse Than You Think.”

“The immigration bill, according to its critics, hands out amnesty to illegal immigrants as soon as some ineffectual steps toward enforcement are taken. Don’t believe it. The bill provides amnesty as soon as it is enacted.”

You can read the rest here

Grilling a Senator.

     Hugh Hewitt has taken the lead on the Senate Immigration Bill. Here are his comments on his Wednesday interview with Senator Kyl (Hugh is not convinced and neither are we. Kyl is sounding very slick these days.)

     Hewitt has a transcript of the interview or you can listen to a recording of the interview.

     Kyl seems to be shifting the blame for this flawed legislation to the voters by repeating the line “my constituents in my last reelection in November said do something about illegal immigration.” When we were telling you to do something we meant something to fix the issue not conspire with Senator Kennedy to make the situation worse.

Update: Yahoo! News has an AP article about the “Gang of 12.” The deck seems pretty stacked when they get committed liberals like Ted Kennedy and Diane Feinstein and our side gets a committed liberal like Arlen Specter.

CONGRATULATIONS JORDIN SPARKS!

Jordin Sparks

Congratulations Jordin Sparks!!!

You have made us so very proud!

May GOD bless You!